Numerical simulation reveals discrepancies between standard drag formulations and resolved simulations during bore propagation through vegetation, highlighting the impact of water fluctuations.
In this study, we estimated vegetation drag forces exerted on a propagating bore, represented by arrays of emergent cylinders in the experimental setup, by accounting for free-surface and bottom pressure fluctuations around the cylinders. To capture these fluctuations, we employed NUFSAW2D, our in-house non-hydrostatic shallow-water solver with turbulence closure, where the cylinders were fully resolved using fine-resolution meshes of up to 7.5 mm. Three initial Froude numbers (1.32, 1.53, and 3.98) were considered to generate the bore. Within the vegetated zone, complex wave-vortex-vegetation interactions were observed, and our fully resolved model accurately predicted water-level fluctuations under medium and high Froude number conditions. For the low Froude number case, the amplitude was well captured; however, slight discrepancies in wave period indicated significant non-hydrostatic effects. To quantify vegetation drag, we compared the fully resolved model with several drag-force formulations. Results revealed notable discrepancies between the two approaches under conditions of strong water-level fluctuations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ginting et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: