Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals low objective amblyopia knowledge among primary care attendees, highlighting the need for targeted parental education on routine vision screening.
Background: Amblyopia causes lifelong monocular visual impairment when detection or treatment is delayed. Families influence screening and adherence, yet knowledge in primary care populations remains incompletely characterized. Objective: To assess objective and perceived amblyopia knowledge, identify associated factors, and examine agreement between self-rated and objectively scored knowledge among families attending primary care clinics. Methods: This cross-sectional survey analyzed 105 attendees from July 12–15, 2026. A nine-item instrument adapted from Basheikh et al. generated a 0–15 score; scores ≥8 indicated adequate knowledge. Confidence intervals, nonparametric tests, chi-square tests, false-discovery-rate correction, logistic regression, and agreement analyses were used. Results: The mean score was 6.30±3.31; median was 7 (IQR 4–9), and 43 participants (41.0%; 95% CI 32.0%–50.5%) had adequate knowledge. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s α=.761). Fully adequate recognition was uncommon for causes (1.9%), symptoms (2.9%), risk factors (4.8%), and treatment (15.2%); 19.0% endorsed routine examinations as the appropriate time for an ophthalmic visit. Higher scores were associated with self-declared knowledge, having any information source, information-source category, a child’s prior amblyopia diagnosis, belief in curability with adherence, and recognition of parents’ treatment role (all false-discovery-rate q≤.005). Adequate knowledge was associated with self-declared knowledge, any information source, and a child’s prior diagnosis (all q=.017). The adjusted model was significant overall (likelihood-ratio χ2[5]=17.66, p=.003; AUC=.713), although no individual predictor was significant. Self-assessment showed fair agreement with objective adequacy (κ=.283). Conclusion: Knowledge was incomplete despite positive treatment attitudes. Primary care should deliver timely, effective, repeated education emphasizing asymptomatic disease, routine screening, causal pathways, and correct treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almousa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: