Cross-sectional study reveals distinct predictors for fall occurrence versus fall-related injury in older adults, indicating prevention strategies should evaluate these outcomes separately.
Background Current fall prevention strategies have been built predominantly on the factors associated with fall occurrence rather than fall-related injury, and the determinants of these two outcomes may be distinct. This study aimed to identify distinct factors associated with past-year fall occurrence (non-fallers vs. fallers) and fall-related injury (non-injurious vs. injurious fallers) in community-dwelling older adults. Methods In this cross-sectional, secondary analysis, 9,950 community-dwelling older adults were included (mean age 74.0 years, standard deviation 6.8, 61.6% women). Binomial logistic regression was used to separately identify the associated factors for fall occurrence and fall-related injury, assessing demographics, chronic diseases, functional abilities, and home modifications. Results Past-year fall occurrence was primarily associated with women (odds ratio (OR) = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19–2.30), drinking (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.03–1.99), higher number of chronic diseases (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.24–1.36), assistive devices usage (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.19–1.43), and activities of daily living (ADL) limitations (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.04–1.11). In contrast, fall-related injury was associated with younger age (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93–0.99), lower weight (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95–0.996), lower number of assistive devices (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68–0.98), and higher number of ADL limitations (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01–1.13). Notably, home modifications were not associated with lower odds of either outcome ( p > 0.05). Conclusions Our study highlights distinct differences between the associated factors for past-year fall occurrence and fall-related injury. The inverse association for assistive devices should not be read as evidence that devices protect against injury. Future guidelines should address these outcomes separately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: