Panel analysis reveals increased vertical party competition improves education spending across Indian states, indicating multi-tiered rivalry limits collusion and enhances public service delivery.
Party competition impedes local service delivery when parties collude. This article argues that the type of competition matters more than its mere intensity. Vertical competition – between national and regional parties – constrains collusion and improves service delivery, whereas competition confined to either national or regional parties is unlikely to generate similar effects. Using a state–year panel for Indian states (2004–2021), the article finds that more verticalised party systems are associated with 2–3 percent higher education spending per person. The implication is that decentralisation can be effective when party systems are structured to deter collusive incentives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiyu Park (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: