PulseExploreJournal ClubTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 30, 2026Middle East Current PsychiatryOpen Access

Impact of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on cognitive function and dementia Risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on the timing hypothesis and administration route

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SFS. S. FangSCSheng-Han Chen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review and meta-analysis reveals timing-dependent dementia risk from hormone therapy in postmenopausal women, suggesting early initiation provides cognitive protection.

Key Points

  • To systematically evaluate the impact of menopausal hormone therapy on cognitive outcomes and dementia risk, assessing effect modification by initiation timing, formulation, route, and duration.
  • Searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science through May 2026 for randomized controlled trials and observational cohorts evaluating hormone therapy and cognition.
  • Identified 65 studies for qualitative synthesis and 12 studies (contributing 18 effect estimates) for quantitative random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian–Laird estimator.
  • Stratified analyses by initiation timing (<5 versus >5 years from final menstrual period), formulation (estrogen-only versus combined), administration route (oral, transdermal, vaginal), and duration.
  • Any hormone therapy use versus never-use showed a neutral overall association with incident all-cause dementia (pooled aRR 1.06, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.15; k = 4; I2 = 96%).
  • Therapy initiation within five years of menopause significantly reduced dementia risk (pooled aRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83; k = 3; I2 = 0%; p = 0.0003), whereas initiation after five years showed no protective effect (pooled aRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.29; k = 2; I2 = 0%).
  • Long-term combined estrogen–progestogen regimens were associated with increased dementia risk (pooled aRR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.36; k = 4; I2 = 89%; p = 0.0002), while transdermal estradiol (pooled aRR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.07; k = 2) and vaginal estrogen (pooled aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.02) showed no significant risk elevation.

Cite This Study

Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93f07a6c1a8fb52e79ca6ahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-026-00654-x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share