Observational study demonstrates vertical stratification of soil metals and shifting bacterial communities in alligator habitats, suggesting depth-dependent microbial stability.
Soil metal contamination poses potential risks to ecosystem health, yet its vertical distribution and impacts on microbial communities in protected wildlife habitats remain poorly understood. This study investigated the vertical variation (0–80 cm) in seven metals or metalloids (Zn, Cr, Cu, Co, Ni, As, and Pb) and their correlations with soil bacterial communities in the Chinese Changxing Alligator Nature Reserve, Zhejiang Province, China. Soil samples were collected from two functional zones—the Reserved Breeding Zone (FY) and Reintroduction Zone (FG)—at four depth intervals. The results revealed distinct vertical stratification for both soil elements (metals and metalloids) and bacterial communities. Soil element concentrations exhibited depth-dependent variations, with surface layers showing higher accumulation of Zn, Ni, Cu, Cr and Pb, while As was enriched in deeper horizons. Bacterial alpha diversity declined with depth, and community composition shifted markedly: Pseudomonadota and Actinomycetota dominated surface soils, whereas Acidobacteriota and Chloroflexota increased in deeper layers. Network analysis revealed that microbial co-occurrence network complexity decreased with soil depth, indicating greater stability and environmental adaptability of surface soil microbial communities. Pearson correlation and Mantel analyses revealed significant depth-related variation in soil element concentrations (Zn, Co, Ni, Cu, Pb, Cr, and As), and these patterns were closely associated with shifts in soil bacterial community structure. This study provides systematic evidence of vertical differentiation in soil element–microbe interactions within reserve soil profiles, offering a scientific basis for habitat quality assessment, ecological risk warning, and Chinese alligator habitat conservation and management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qianying et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: