Experimental study finds no significant change in impulse purchasing among college students, indicating that brief five-day self-monitoring may be insufficient.
Impulse purchasing among college students is increasingly relevant in consumer environments characterized by digital payments, promotional exposure, and reduced transactional friction. This study examined short-term change in impulse purchasing tendencies during a five-day daily expense-tracking study. A quantitative pretest-posttest experimental procedure involved 30 college students, with 15 assigned to an expense-tracking condition and 15 to a neutral mood-monitoring condition. Impulse purchasing tendencies were measured before and after the intervention using the Impulse Buying Tendency Scale, and participants also completed a simulated shopping activity involving a fixed budget and promotional purchase cues. Across the full sample, the mean impulse purchasing score declined from 3.29 (SD = 0.475) at pretest to 3.19 (SD = 0.421) at posttest. A conventional two-sided paired-samples t-test based on the retained test statistic indicated that the overall pretest-posttest difference was not statistically significant, t(29) = 0.966, p = .342, with a small effect size (Cohen's d = 0.176). Because the archived statistical output did not retain group-specific inferential results, the findings are interpreted as overall short-term change across the sample rather than as a definitive between-condition treatment effect. The study suggests that substantial short-term change in impulse purchasing was not evident during the five-day period and supports further investigation of longer-duration financial self-monitoring interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cervantes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: