Policy analysis reveals severe socioeconomic hardship from trade restrictions in Cuba, suggesting economic coercion functions as a form of state terrorism.
This paper examines the use of tariffs and broader trade restrictions by the United States against Cuba as a form of economic coercion that produces effects comparable to state-sponsored terrorism. By analysing U.S. tariff policies within the wider framework of the embargo, the paper argues that these measures are designed not merely to influence state behaviour but to generate systemic economic insecurity, civilian hardship, and political instability. Drawing on political economy, international law, and human security frameworks, the paper assesses the material and social consequences of U.S. trade policy on Cuban development, public welfare, and sovereignty. The study contributes to debates on economic warfare, sanctions ethics, and the expanding conceptual boundaries of terrorism in international relations
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Constantinos Alexiou (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: