Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study reveals lower serum zinc predicts pharmacological treatment needs in gestational diabetes, suggesting its role as a candidate prognostic biomarker.
Objective: To characterize serum zinc and a broader micronutrient panel in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) versus normoglycemic controls, and to evaluate associations between serum zinc, pharmacological treatment requirement and triglyceride concentration within GDM.Material and Methods: In this observational study with a one-week prospective follow-up component, 100 women with GDM and 100 frequency-matched controls were studied at a tertiary center. A nine-analyte micronutrient panel was compared with Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Zinc was measured at diagnosis and treatment requirement determined one week later by a prespecified capillary glucose rule. Incremental value was tested by adding zinc to a baseline clinical model (age, body mass index, parity, three OGTT values, HbA1c).Results: Only zinc differed after correction (77.0 [71.0-80.4] vs. 86.3 [76.0-96.0] µg/dL; rank-biserial r = -0.47; q < .001), with serum zinc below 70 µg/dL more frequent in GDM (20% vs. 1%). Triglycerides were higher in GDM, whereas HDL-C and LDL-C did not differ. Diet-managed women had higher zinc than those treated pharmacologically (85.5 vs. 75.3 µg/dL). Adding zinc improved discrimination from an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.510 to 0.833 (DeLong p = .003). Zinc was inversely associated with triglycerides after adjustment for age and BMI (β = -2.65 mg/dL per µg/dL; p = .008).Conclusion: Lower serum zinc at diagnosis was associated with subsequent pharmacological treatment requirement and carried information beyond routine clinical variables, supporting its evaluation as a candidate prognostic marker rather than an established predictor. External validation is required before clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oguzhanoglu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: