Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study finds intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention in mild traumatic brain injury, indicating that clinical severity matters more than CT positivity alone.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) remains a major clinical challenge, particularly in aging societies. This study characterized the incidence, clinical relevance, and associated clinical factors of computed tomography (CT)-positive traumatic intracranial lesions in adults with mTBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Relevant data were retrospectively collected from adults with mTBI who underwent head CT at our Emergency Department between April 2023 and April 2024. Clinical characteristics, medication exposure, CT findings, and the need for neurosurgical intervention were analyzed. CT images were interpreted in routine practice by Board-certified radiologists, and CT-positive cases were classified according to the Marshall CT criteria. RESULTS: =0.021, respectively). Falling was the predominant mechanism of injury (86.6%). Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (50.0%) and intracerebral hemorrhage or contusion (42.4%) were the most common CT findings. Most CT-positive cases were Marshall grade II (93.9%), and eight patients (12.1% of CT-positive cases; 1.7% of the total cohort) required neurosurgical intervention. In a prespecified descriptive subgroup analysis of patients with numerically documented triage Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13-15, clinically relevant CT-positive lesions and neurosurgical interventions were still observed in the GCS 15 subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this CT-selected older cohort with mTBI, CT-positive traumatic intracranial lesions were not rare. Although most lesions were radiologically mild, a clinically important minority required neurosurgical intervention. These findings support emphasizing radiological severity and downstream management, not CT positivity alone, when evaluating older adults with mTBI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: