Retrospective cohort study reveals risk factors for early neurological deterioration in minor stroke, highlighting tools for enhanced clinical monitoring.
Early neurological deterioration (END) was common after minor subcortical infarction, but prediction was complicated by heterogeneous mechanisms, including intrinsic small-vessel disease and branch atheromatous disease (BAD). A retrospective analysis included 240 patients admitted within 24 h of symptom onset with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 5 or less. END was defined as an increase of at least 2 NIHSS points within 72 h after admission. The primary logistic model retained admission systolic blood pressure (SBP) as a continuous variable and included baseline NIHSS, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and vascular stenosis of at least 50%. A three-knot restricted cubic spline was used to assess SBP nonlinearity. Internal validation used 1,000 bootstrap resamples, and calibration used bootstrap out-of-bag predictions. END occurred in 54 of 240 patients (22.5%). For each 10 mmHg increase in SBP, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.36); the corresponding ORs were 1.36 (1.04-1.78) per NIHSS point, 1.34 (1.10-1.62) per NLR unit, and 2.21 (1.13-4.31) for stenosis. Evidence of SBP nonlinearity was absent (P = 0.595). The primary model had an apparent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.762 (95% bootstrap CI, 0.686-0.826), an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.741, and an out-of-bag Brier score of 0.158. MRI-only, parent-artery-stenosis exclusion, and ischemic-END analyses were directionally consistent. Suspected BAD was present in 83.3% of END cases and materially increased performance in an expanded exploratory model, emphasizing etiologic heterogeneity. In a 24-h landmark analysis, the addition of SBP variability improved discrimination for deterioration after 24 h, but these post-admission metrics were not included in the admission-only model. The nomogram provided an internally validated prognostic estimate for enhanced monitoring and reassessment; external validation was required before treatment selection or bedside implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: