Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 30, 2026International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management

Navigating geopolitical storms: ESG buffering, threshold effects, and bank resilience in Islamic versus conventional banking

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HKHasan KazakMİMustafa İYİBİLDİRENMÖMuhammed Hadin ÖNER

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Panel data analysis reveals regime-dependent geopolitical risk impacts on profitability across 135 OIC banks, suggesting ESG buffers conventional but not Islamic institutions.

Key Points

  • To examine how geopolitical risk influences bank profitability across OIC countries, evaluating the moderating roles of ESG performance, banking structure, and sukuk market depth.
  • Analyzed panel datasets of 135 Islamic and conventional banks across OIC member countries spanning 2006–2024 and 2021–2024.
  • Estimated relationships using Hansen's panel threshold model, mean-centered triple-interaction models, Johnson-Neyman regions, fixed effects, and a Mundlak decomposition.
  • Geopolitical risk (GPR) displays a regime-dependent relationship with return on assets (ROA), showing a weak positive association in lower-risk regimes and no supported decline during higher-risk regimes.
  • Higher ESG performance attenuates the adverse GPR association in conventional banks, whereas the conditional GPR effect remains statistically insignificant for Islamic banks.
  • Islamic banks exhibit a more favorable GPR association than conventional banks at low ESG levels, a relationship that reverses at elevated ESG levels, while sukuk depth shows no significant effect.

Cite This Study

Kazak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a93f0f56c1a8fb52e79d783https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-05-2026-0361
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share