Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial reveals in-person support groups outperform avatar virtual reality for psychological distress in Ukrainian refugees, suggesting digital interventions require targeted refinement.
BACKGROUND: Millions of Ukrainians displaced since 2022 experience high rates of depression, anxiety and distress, with major barriers to in-person mental healthcare. Immersive avatar-based virtual reality environments may offer scalable psychosocial support while preserving key therapeutic elements. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of avatar-based virtual reality support groups versus in-person support groups and a waitlist control among Ukrainian refugees in Romania. METHOD: In this 3-arm randomised controlled trial, 156 participants were assigned to avatar virtual reality groups, in-person support groups or a waitlist control. Assessments were conducted at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention and at 3-month follow-up. Primary analyses used clustered intention-to-treat longitudinal mixed models with cluster-robust standard errors. Complementary baseline-adjusted analysis of covariance and sensitivity analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Most between-group comparisons favoured the interventions but many lacked statistical significance, probably owing to attrition and clustering. In-person groups showed the strongest benefits, in particular, they were associated with greater perceived social support versus waitlist at post-intervention and reduced anxiety in end-point analyses. Avatar virtual reality effects were smaller and non-significant. Effects were largely attenuated at follow-up. Sensitivity analyses excluding participants with high levels of baseline trauma identified stronger treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: In-person support groups demonstrated the strongest short-term psychosocial benefits, especially for perceived social support. Delivery of the avatar virtual reality intervention proved feasible, but the intervention did not show consistent superiority or equivalence to in-person groups. The findings support further refinement of immersive interventions with improved retention strategies and trauma-sensitive adaptations, particularly across populations with varying digital familiarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giosan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: