Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review reveals multilevel barriers to follow-up colonoscopy after positive stool screening, highlighting the need for navigation and policy reforms to ensure timely diagnosis.
Non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening (e.g., fecal immunochemical test [FIT], guaiac fecal occult blood test [gFOBT], multitarget stool DNA [mt-sDNA]) reduces CRC mortality only when a positive result is followed by timely diagnostic colonoscopy. We synthesized barriers and facilitators to completing diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based screening test. Guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched PubMed and MEDLINE (Ovid) for English-language, peer-reviewed studies (October 2008- June 2025) reporting barriers, facilitators, or determinants of colonoscopy completion after a positive non-invasive stool-based CRC screening test (FIT, gFOBT, or mt-sDNA). Two reviewers independently abstracted study characteristics and coded barriers/facilitators, which were categorized using a socioecological framework (intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community/environmental, policy). 38 studies directly examined colonoscopy follow-up after a positive non-invasive test. Recurrent barriers included fear/anxiety and low perceived risk (intrapersonal), weak provider recommendation and support (interpersonal), referral and tracking failures and scheduling delays (organizational), transportation and distance (community/environmental), and cost-sharing/coverage gaps (policy). Evidence specifically assessing rural-urban differences was limited. Barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based CRC screening test are multi-level and potentially modifiable through improved communication, navigation, and closed-loop tracking. Multicomponent approaches that combine clear communication, navigation and reminder systems, transportation supports, and reduced financial barriers may improve diagnostic completion and equity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: