Theoretical analysis reveals a non-reductionist ontological model in fundamental physics, suggesting mechanical interactions are subordinate to systemic constraints and environmental coupling.
Traditional theoretical physics is dominated by a reductionist obsession with micro-mechanics and the perpetual search for how every physical interaction unfolds. This paper presents an inverted epistemological and ontological framework that shifts the primary focus from mechanical transit to ultimate systemic destinations (what) and governing constraints (why). By analyzing quantum entanglement through environmental coupling, introducing a multi-axiomatic architecture with non-overlapping domains, defining the "master lock" paradigm, and viewing reality as an infinite, unbroken line perceived only through finite segments, we demonstrate that physical mechanics are merely a secondary spectacle. Within this view, uncertainty acts not as a flaw, but as the breathing engine of a boundless game of possibilities where infinite pathways harmonize toward inevitable structural truths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Achyut Rateria (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: