Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study reveals compartment-specific lipid remodeling across colorectal cancer stages, highlighting candidate metabolic markers for tumor progression.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) progression involves extensive metabolic reprogramming, but stage-related lipid alterations across circulating and local tissue compartments remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to map serum and paired tumor–margin ontology-level lipid signals associated with pathological CRC progression. A cross-sectional cohort of 122 patients with histologically confirmed CRC stages I–IV was analyzed. Untargeted lipidomic profiling of preoperative serum and paired tumor and adjacent margin tissues was performed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in positive and negative ionization modes. Feature-level signals were aggregated by MS-DIAL lipid ontology. Serum ontologies were evaluated individually, whereas tissue models jointly included adjacent-margin background and the within-patient tumor-vs-margin difference. Ordinal proportional-odds models were used for TNM, T and N stages, and logistic regression for angioinvasion and neuroinvasion. Unadjusted and age- and sex-adjusted models were reported. P values were nominal without correction for multiple testing. Serum negative-ionization associations were predominantly inverse. Higher MMPE signal was associated with lower odds of a more advanced TNM category (adjusted OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.98; nominal p = 0.034) and lower odds of a higher N stage (adjusted OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.99; nominal p = 0.042). In positive ionization, TG-EST (adjusted OR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.06–1.96; nominal p = 0.018) and EtherTG (adjusted OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.08–4.74; nominal p = 0.031) were associated with higher T stage, whereas BRSE was associated with higher TNM stage (adjusted OR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–2.00; nominal p = 0.024) and N stage (adjusted OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.08–2.11; nominal p = 0.016). In tissue models, a higher tumor-vs-margin BileAcid signal was associated with more advanced TNM stage (adjusted OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.05–2.75; nominal p = 0.031) and angioinvasion (adjusted OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.13–3.52; nominal p = 0.018), whereas the Cer_EODS tumor-vs-margin signal was associated with higher T stage (adjusted OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.14–2.40; nominal p = 0.008) and N stage (adjusted OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.16–2.51; nominal p = 0.006). CRC progression was associated with heterogeneous and compartment-specific ontology-level lipid remodeling rather than a uniform lipid signature. These findings identify candidate serum and tissue lipid domains for targeted, species-resolved validation, but do not establish confirmatory biomarkers because of the exploratory design and absence of multiplicity correction. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fleszar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: