Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational study demonstrates improved accuracy and twofold acceleration in seismic full-waveform inversion, highlighting flexible deep learning reparameterization for multi-source data.
Full‐waveform inversion (FWI) relies on sequential‐source (SQ) workflows for high imaging precision, while simultaneous‐source (SML) encoding drastically accelerates computation but introduces irreversible wavenumber discontinuity artifacts in hybrid‐domain implementations. Existing automatic differentiation‐based deep learning (DL) FWI only supports standalone sequential‐source inversion and suffers excessive memory overhead, failing to realize crosstalk‐free multi‐source inversion. To address these limitations, we propose an adjoint‐state‐gradient coupled long short‐term memory (LSTM) reparameterized framework compatible with both SQ and SML FWIs. A dedicated LSTM regularization scheme is designed to mitigate wavenumber discontinuity induced by discrete‐frequency source encoding, combined with phase‐sensitive detection to achieve crosstalk‐free gradient calculation for multi‐source cases. Numerical tests on Marmousi II, Overthrust, and Canadian Foothills benchmark models and field seismic data demonstrate that the proposed LSTM reparameterization significantly improves inversion accuracy against conventional SQ/SML FWI. DL‐based SML FWI achieves nearly identical imaging precision to DL‐based SQ FWI while delivering over twofold computational acceleration. This unified pipeline enables flexible selection between high‐precision DL‐SQ FWI and high‐efficiency DL‐SML FWI according to field noise and computational constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: