Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mathematical analysis reveals exact conservation laws for residual maps in binary linear recurrence bases, indicating that greedy invertibility fails when dominant roots reach two.
We study a spatial residual map Ψ defined on binary strings of length n associated with linear recurrence sequences. Unlike the standard balancing map, which compares a string to the extremal configurations of its weight, Ψ compares a string to itself: Δ(v) = val(Mk,n) − val(v) and Ψ(v) = greedy(Δ(v)).On bases whose recurrence coefficients all lie in {0, 1} (Fibonacci, Tribonacci, Padovan, Tetranacci, Slow), Ψ admits an exact conservation law: every 2-cycle {v₁, v₂} satisfies wt(v₁) = wt(v₂) = k and val(v₁) + val(v₂) = val(Mk,n)exactly. Consequently the normalized sum of the two values tends to α / (α − 1) whenever the common weight diverges.The threshold α = 2 is tied to a concrete breakdown of full-range binary greedy invertibility: any {0, 1}-coefficient recurrence has dominant root strictly less than 2, while bases with a coefficient ≥ 2 (Pell, Fast) exhibit failure rates of 90–99 % on the interval [0, S_n].Sensitivity experiments show that the earlier “two-branch dichotomy” is an artifact of the reconstruction rule rather than of the balancing construction itself: under lazy or dual reconstruction the attractors lock onto the integers 1 and 2.This note is a companion to the paper “Fixed Points of the Generalized Zeckendorf Balancing Map and their Unified Asymptotic Ratios.”Keywords: Zeckendorf representation, residual maps, 2-cycles, conservation laws, greedy invertibility, linear recurrences, numeration systems
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gavin Roberts (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: