Cross-sectional survey reveals significant life-stage and geographic variations in online shopping among urban women, highlighting the need for localized sub-city retail market segmentation.
Research on women’s digital consumption in India has largely proceeded on the assumption that “women shop-pers” constitute a coherent market. This paper questions that assumption. Drawing on survey responses from 385 womenin Visakhapatnam, a rapidly digitising tier-two city on India’s eastern seaboard, we examine whether purchase engagement,category repertoire and platform preference vary systematically by life stage and by location within a single urban area. Threelife-stage segments were compared: students, working women and homemakers. Engagement differed sharply across them,F(2, 382) = 44.46, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.189, with a monotonic gradient from students (M = 4.12) through working women(M = 3.78) to homemakers (M = 3.34); the students–homemakers contrast was large by conventional standards (d = 1.28).Segment composition also varied across the city’s four zones, χ2(6) = 12.79, p = 0.047, Cramér’s V = 0.129, with home-makers markedly over-represented in the peripheral western zone and working women concentrated in the northern residentialcorridor. At city level, purchasing was routine rather than occasional (77.1% shopping at least two to four times monthly),category demand was led by fashion (29.1%) and groceries (22.1%), and platform preference was highly concentrated (top-twoshare 59.0%, HHI = 0.205). Taken together, the results indicate that aggregate portraits of the “Indian woman online shopper”conceal more than they reveal, and that meaningful segmentation in tier-two markets operates at a sub-city spatial scale thatnational survey designs cannot detect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
N. Divya Jaya Lakshmi, K. S. Bose, Jaladi Ravi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: