Design framework demonstrates intentional epistemic friction protocols for generative AI in leadership education, indicating how pedagogical discord can be ethically governed.
This article presents a technical architecture and classroom protocols for Trickster AI, an approach to generative AI in leadership education that prioritizes epistemic friction over optimization. Building on a companion paper, it operationalizes trickster pedagogy through a five-layer system: pedagogical policy, cultural logic, contradiction engine, rupture scheduler, and debrief-evidence layers. It presents four protocols: the contradiction clinic, refusal studio, delay device, and relational accountability simulation, guiding interaction, debriefing, accessibility, trauma-informed care, and relational assessment. The central contribution is a bridge between decolonial theory and educational design practice, showing epistemic friction can be specified as a design problem, ethically governed and translated into pedagogical protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ofosu-Asare et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: