Theoretical analysis reveals exponential separations between full compilation and task-semantic images in Boolean theories, highlighting three independent costs required for tractable reasoning.
Knowledge compilation transforms Boolean theories into reusable representations that support many downstream queries, but this generality can preserve distinctions a particular task will never observe. We introduce Task-Semantic Images (TSIs), the exact images of model sets under task-specified semantic maps, and develop a complexity theory for computing only the distinctions visible to a downstream computation. We prove an exact replacement theorem, an exponential separation between complete DNNF representation and compact task-semantic images, a proper-affine semantic-collapse theorem with polynomially closed composition, and a natural cardinality-image theorem for bipartite graph CNFs. We then prove the complementary Semantic-Resolution Barrier: polynomially many semantic states do not imply efficient realizability, because constrained minimum vertex cover remains NP-complete on bipartite graphs. This identifies three independent costs—image size, state realizability, and composition—that must all remain controlled for task-relative exact reasoning to be tractable. Reproducible experiments exhaustively verify finite affine and cardinality identities, compare exact finite OBDD state growth with TSI growth, and measure barrier-state behavior across generated instances. The Apache-2.0 software provides tests, a command-line interface, automated reproduction, and an interactive laboratory. The results establish a principled middle ground between complete reusable compilation and one-shot decision without implying a general polynomial-time breakthrough for SAT reasoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Md. Amir Khusru Akhtar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: