Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review outlines dye sensitization strategies for graphitic carbon nitride composites, highlighting improved solar harvesting and charge separation for solar energy conversion.
Graphitic carbon nitride (g‐C 3 N 4 or g‐CN) is an extensively studied photocatalyst; however, its efficiency is hampered by a high rate of recombination reaction and limited solar energy harvesting capability. To maximize its photocatalytic activity, researchers have engineered diverse strategies. Among different methods, dye sensitization improves the absorption region and also facilitates the separation of photogenerated charge carriers between dyes and g‐C 3 N 4 (sensitization) or vice versa (dyes as cocatalyst) depending on band potentials and their alignment at the interface. This article reviews the effect of sensitization of g‐C 3 N 4 with phthalocyanine dye for various photocatalytic applications. The photophysical properties of phthalocyanine can be tailored via central metal incorporation (e.g., Fe, Ni, and Zn), periphery or ring functionalization, molecular engineering, anchoring bulky groups, embedding it on a polymeric support, etc., to enhance the photocatalytic properties of phthalocyanine/g‐C 3 N 4 composites. When combined with g‐C 3 N 4 , its high molar extinction coefficient strengthens the absorption sensitivity across the solar spectrum for enhanced visible light activity. This review article provides guidance for the structural design and construction of highly efficient dye‐sensitized g‐C 3 N 4 catalysts employed for photocatalytic applications in hydrogen generation, carbon dioxide reduction, and degradation of toxic pollutants. In the end, perspectives and challenges of dyes on g‐C 3 N 4 as a photocatalyst have been analyzed and discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: