Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis finds improved diagnostic accuracy with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in suspected breast cancer, suggesting enhanced differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.
Purpose This study aimed to determine whether the addition of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) to B-mode ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed (MEDLINE), Ichushi, and the Cochrane Library up to July 2025. Eligible studies assessed the diagnostic performance of CEUS for suspected breast cancer, with histopathology as the reference standard. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. Results Eleven studies comprising 1987 patients with 2051 lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of B-mode ultrasonography alone were 86.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 81.5–89.7) and 70.8% (95%CI 60.7–79.2), respectively. For B-mode alone, the pooled DOR was 15.0 (95%CI 9.7–23.3), with an LR + of 2.95 (95% CI 2.18–3.99) and an LR − of 0.20 (95% CI 0.15–0.26). In contrast, CEUS was associated with improved pooled estimates of diagnostic performance, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 93.4% (95%CI 89.0–96.2) and a specificity of 85.8% (95%CI 80.9–89.6). The pooled DOR for CEUS was 86.3 (95%CI 48.0–155.4), with an LR + of 6.59 (95%CI 4.89–8.87) and an LR − of 0.08 (95%CI 0.05–0.13). Conclusions Pooled diagnostic estimates were higher in studies evaluating CEUS combined with B-mode ultrasonography than in studies evaluating B-mode ultrasonography alone, particularly by increasing specificity in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. However, these findings are based on indirect comparisons and should be interpreted with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
INOUE et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: