Formal modeling study demonstrates that behavioral equivalence fails to establish institutional equivalence in machine control policies, highlighting the need for eight-obligation governance gates.
This research preprint introduces institutional compilation: a formal model for the governed transformation from governing source to admitted meaning to warranted machine control. The model defines eight jointly necessary obligations: source binding, admission authority, semantic conservation, preservation of unresolved uncertainty, authority non-amplification, temporal currentness, version binding, and faithful target projection. It presents six propositions and countermodels, including the result that behavioral equivalence between executable policies is insufficient to establish institutional equivalence. A bounded executable checker exhaustively covers all 6,561 states of the eight-obligation gate and kills five compensatory or omission mutants. That experiment establishes conformance of the finite aggregation rule only; it does not establish natural-language semantic correctness, OIC benchmark superiority, legal or regulatory compliance, or independent validation. The Open Institutional Compiler (OIC) is presented as an author-affiliated reference architecture for realizing the model, not as the definition of the model itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arkadiy Miteiko (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: