Key result
Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was associated with a significantly higher rate of subsequent ventral hernia repair compared to bypass procedures (7.93% vs 5.8%; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair increase the risk of subsequent ventral hernia repair compared to open aortofemoral or aortoiliac bypass?
Cohort (n=17,594)
Yes
Does open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair increase the risk of subsequent ventral hernia repair compared to open aortofemoral or aortoiliac bypass?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.93% vs 5.8%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Ventral hernia repair is more common after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared to bypass procedures for occlusive disease, suggesting a potential role for prophylactic mesh placement.
Open AAA repair was associated with higher subsequent VHR than bypass; leaves open whether prophylactic mesh merits prospective evaluation.
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the rate of ventral hernia repair (VHR) after open abdominal aortic anneurysm in New York State compared with the rate of VHR after open abdominal aortic bypass procedures. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried for all abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and bypass procedures performed between 2000 and 2010. Social security death index was used to identify patients who died. The cause-specific Cox proportional hazard model was applied to compare the risk of having follow-up VHR between patients with AAA and bypass with death as a competing risk event. A multivariable model was used to explore independent relationship with the risk of having follow-up ventral hernia after adjusting for other factors. There were 9314 patients who underwent open AAA repair, 739 (7.93%) of which had subsequent VHR. Comparatively, 8280 patients underwent aortofemoral or aortoiliac bypass procedures, with 480 (5.8%) undergoing subsequent VHR. The observed one-year, five-year, and 10-year VHR rates for AAA versus bypass were 2.8 versus 1.8 per cent, 10.0 versus 8.0 per cent, 10.7 versus 9.38 per cent, respectively. After controlling for all other factors, patients undergoing AAA repair were more likely and elderly patients were less likely to undergo VHR (P < 0.0001). Patients with serious comorbid conditions such as valvular disease, diabetes mellitus, and neurologic disorders were less likely to undergo subsequent VHR controlling for other factors. VHR after AAA procedures is more common compared with bypass procedures for occlusive disease. Because this patient population has significant comorbidity, prophylactic mesh placement may play a role in preventing necessity for future procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altieri et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortofemoral or aortoiliac occlusive disease (n=17,594). Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair vs. Open aortofemoral or aortoiliac bypass procedures was evaluated on Subsequent ventral hernia repair (p=<0.0001). Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was associated with a significantly higher rate of subsequent ventral hernia repair compared to bypass procedures (7.93% vs 5.8%; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: