Recent studies have indicated that the use of the MIB-1 immunostaining may be useful in distinguishing endocervical neoplasia from benign nonneoplastic lesions. We sought to investigate this finding further with a specific emphasis on the common benign processes that may result in a nonspecific increase of MIB-1 staining. In this study we quantified the MIB-1 immunostaining in the mucinous endocervical epithelium (n=45) and in tubal metaplasia (n=28) during the proliferative and secretory phases (hormonal influence), in the mucinous endocervical epithelium in cases of cervicitis (inflammation) (n=10), in cases with a history of a recent biopsy (regeneration) (n=15), endocervical polyps (benign growth) (n=8), in the endocervical glands adjacent to a squamous intraepithelial lesion (human papilloma virus [HPV] infection) (n=63), and in in situ and invasive cervical adenocarcinomas (n=30). All cases with increased MIB-1 staining were subsequently tested for the presence of HPV DNA. The range of MIB-1 staining in the benign endocervical epithelium was from 0% to 48% and in the neoplastic epithelium from 25% to 84%. MIB-1 staining below 10% always reflected a benign process and MIB-1 staining higher than 50% was always associated with a neoplasia. Rare benign cases (tubal metaplasia during the proliferative phase, glands adjacent to squamous intraepithelial lesions, and cases with a history of a recent biopsy) had increased MIB-1 index, which overlapped with the neoplastic cases. In conclusion, MIB-1 is a useful marker of endocervical neoplasia, although in rare cases an overlap between benign and neoplastic cases may exist.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pirog et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: