This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Aim: Early detection of oral cancer is critical, yet public awareness remains a barrier. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of clinically detected oral mucosal lesions and assess oral cancer awareness in an adult Turkish population. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1250 patient records from a university clinic. Data on demographics, risk factors, and oral hygiene were collected. From this cohort, 263 patients (mean age 53.6 years; 60.8% male) with clinically suspected intraoral lesions were included in the study. Lesion diagnoses were based on clinical examination; a subset of 23 patients underwent histopathological confirmation through biopsy. Included participants completed a structured questionnaire on oral cancer awareness. Results: Oral lesions were clinically detected in 154 of the 263 participants. White lesions were the most common category (43.5%), followed by red-blue lesions (24.7%). A significant association was found between education level and oral cancer awareness ( P < 0.05), with university graduates demonstrating greater knowledge. Higher education was also associated with better oral hygiene habits and fewer self-reported symptoms such as oral burning ( P < 0.05). No significant association was found between the presence of lesions and risk factors such as smoking or alcohol use. Conclusion: A high prevalence of clinically suspected oral lesions was observed, yet a significant gap exists in patient awareness about oral cancer, particularly among individuals with lower education levels. The limited use of biopsy for definitive diagnosis in this real-world setting underscores the need for improved clinical pathways and public health initiatives. Educational campaigns should be prioritized to enhance early detection and bridge the awareness gap.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karasu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: