Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of developmentally-at-risk status on the results of photorefractive screening with iScreen®. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sequentially recruited 169 children (aged 2-5 years) to participate in a blinded, prospective study of a photoscreening device. The principle investigator examined the children after photoscreening. Using established standards for amblyogenic factors, the principle investigator and photoscreen interpreters separately made a determination of "normal" or "needs referral" for each child. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the photoscreening device were determined. RESULTS: Overall, sensitivity was 85% with a positive predictive value of 98%, and specificity was 87% with a negative predictive value of 47%. Developmentally-at-risk status in 34 children (three refused imaging) did not reduce sensitivity (89%) or specificity (100%) when compared with 130 children (two refused imaging) who did not have developmentally-at-risk factors (sensitivity = 84% and specificity = 80%). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of photorefractive screening in young children with developmentally-at-risk status is comparable to results found in normal children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerr et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: