The reliability estimation problem for tests composed of multiple item formats, a common classroom instrument, has largely been ignored. Based on their underlying test models, the two most common internal consistency estimation techniques, the split-halves approach and Cronbach's alpha coefficient, would generally be inappropriate for multiformat instruments. In this article, three models representing varying degrees of part-test parallelism and their appropriateness for "mixed" tests are discussed. The models of focus are: classically parallel, tau-equivalently parallel, and congenerically parallel. It was recog- nized that a test composed of multiple item formats would most likely result in parts with differing functional lengths; such an instrument can be represented only through the adoption of a congeneric model. An appropriate reliability estimate for this type of instrument can be derived using a technique that combines Raju's (1977) and Feldt's (cited in Feldt & Brennan, 1989) procedures. An illustrative example is included to clarify the need for an appropriately modeled reliability technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Audrey L. Qualls (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: