Key result
ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis offered better diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease (AUC 0.75, P<0.001) than conventional criteria like ST-max (AUC 0.57) in patients with LVH.
Why the study?
Does ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis improve the diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG stress tests for coronary artery disease in patients with hypertension-related left ventricular hypertrophy?
Cross-Sectional (n=113)
Yes
Does ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis improve the diagnostic accuracy of exercise ECG stress tests for coronary artery disease in patients with hypertension-related left ventricular hypertrophy?
ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis offers substantially better diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease than conventional ECG stress test criteria in patients with hypertension-related left ventricular hypertrophy.
BACKGROUND: The exercise electrocardiographic stress test (ExET) is the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic method to detect coronary artery disease. However, the sole ST depression criteria (ST-max) have poor specificity for coronary artery disease in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. We hypothesised that ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis, depicting the relative behaviour of ST segment depression during the exercise and recovery phase of the test might increase the diagnostic accuracy of ExET for coronary artery disease detection in such patients. METHODS: In three cardiology centres, we studied 113 consecutive patients (mean age 66 ± 2 years; 88% men) with hypertension-related left ventricular hypertrophy at echocardiography, referred to coronary angiography after an ExET. The following ExET criteria were analysed: ST-max, chronotropic index, heart rate recovery, Duke treadmill score, ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis. RESULTS: We detected significant coronary artery disease at coronary angiography in 61 patients (53%). At receiver-operating characteristic analysis, ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis had the highest area under the curve value (0.75, P < 0.001 when compared with the 'neutral' receiver-operating characteristic curve value of 0.5). Area under the curve values were 0.68 (P < 0.01) for the chronotropic index, 0.58 (P = NS) for heart rate recovery, 0.57 (P = NS) for ST-max and 0.52 (P = NS) for the Duke treadmill score. CONCLUSIONS: Among currently available ExET diagnostic variables, ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis offers a substantially better diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease than conventional criteria in patients with hypertension-related left ventricular hypertrophy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zimarino et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (n=113). ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis vs. Conventional ExET criteria (ST-max, chronotropic index, heart rate recovery, Duke treadmill score) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for significant coronary artery disease at coronary angiography (Area under the curve) (AUC 0.75, p=<0.001). ST-segment depression/heart rate hysteresis offered better diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease (AUC 0.75, P<0.001) than conventional criteria like ST-max (AUC 0.57) in patients with LVH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: