Initial applications of micropiles have involved retrofitting foundations of existing buildings. In these applications, the overall performance of the micropiles–raft (MPR) foundation system is similar to a piled raft foundation where the load is transmitted through both the raft and micropiles. However, there is no guidance available regarding the performance of MPR foundations. In this study, geotechnical centrifuge testing was conducted to investigate the behavior of MPR foundations in sand and evaluate their performance characteristics. The study investigated the effect of raft flexibility on a number of important design parameters, including raft total and differential settlements, raft contact pressure, raft bending moment, and load sharing between the raft and micropiles. In addition, the use of micropiles as settlement reducers was investigated. The results showed that the micropiles carried 42%–59% of the applied load for the MPR configuration considered, which resulted in redistribution of the raft contact pressure. It was found that the Poulos–Davis–Randolph (PDR) method can be used to evaluate the performance of MPR systems with relatively stiff rafts; however, it is not applicable for MPR with flexible raft. A correction factor was proposed to account for the raft flexibility in the PDR method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alnuaim et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: