Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Base-catalyzed intramolecular transesterification in uridine 3‘-(aryl phosphorothioate)s (Up(S)Ar) has been studied with respect to the dependence on the acidity of the conjugate acid of the leaving aryloxy group (p K a 7.1−10) as well as on the basicity of the catalyst (p K a (BH) = 7−10.2). The synthesis of the studied phosphorothioates was accomplished by using a method based on condensation of a protected uridine 3‘-H-phosphonate with the appropriate phenols. The rate constants for hydroxide and imidazole catalysis (25 °C, 0.25 M ionic strength) obey Brønsted linear free energy relationships and the obtained β leaving group (β lg ) values are −0.55 and −0.63, respectively. General-base-catalyzed release of 4-nitrophenoxide from the corresponding phosphorothioate also obeys a Brønsted relationship with respect to the basicity of the catalyst (β = 0.59). Rates of reactions of the phosphorothioates are somewhat lower than for the corresponding phosphates ( k (UpAr) / k ( S P -Up(S)Ar) ≈ 1.7−3.6 and k (UpAr) / k ( R P -Up(S)Ar) ≈ 1.2−2.6 (the spatial arrangement of phosphorus ligands in the S P isomer of Up(S)Ar are the same as in the R P isomer of a dinucleotide). Leffler α values of 0.59 for proton abstraction and 0.36 for bond breaking to the leaving group in the transition state do not balance (imbalance in α = 0.23), indicating some negative charge buildup on the central group of atoms in the transition state. The intramolecular transesterification in uridine 3‘-(aryl phosphorothioate)s is considered to be a concerted associative process with a mechanism that is similar to that in the corresponding phosphate esters, the difference being that the transition state appears to have a slightly more dissociative character for the phosphorothioates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almer et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: