Key result
Low-dose alteplase improves 24-hour oxygenation nearly fivefold over anticoagulation alone in intermediate-high-risk PE.
Why the study?
Does low-dose alteplase improve oxygenation and right ventricular function compared to anticoagulation alone in patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism and PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg?
RCT (n=96)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does low-dose alteplase improve oxygenation and right ventricular function compared to anticoagulation alone in patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism and PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg?
Absolute Event Rate: 40.12% vs 8.48%
p-value: p=<0.01
Objective: ratio < 300 mmHg. Methods: ratio and NT-proBNP were assessed at baseline, 24 h, 3 days, and 7 days, while mPAP was measured at baseline, 24 h, and 7 days. Safety endpoints included mortality, hemodynamic decompensation, and bleeding within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included hospital and ICU stay, costs, and 3-month outcomes. Conclusion: ratio <300 mmHg, low-dose thrombolysis yielded early improvements in oxygenation, mPAP and right ventricular function, with efficacy similar to conventional-dose thrombolysis. We found a numerical reduction in minor bleeding events and no major bleeding across groups. However, the study lacked sufficient statistical power to confirm a true difference in bleeding risk between groups. Further large-sample studies with adequate power are warranted to verify the clinical value of low-dose alteplase for this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Acute intermediate-high-risk pulmonary thromboembolism (n=96). Low-dose alteplase vs. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was evaluated on Change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio from baseline at 24 hours (p=<0.01). Low-dose alteplase significantly improved early oxygenation compared to anticoagulation alone in patients with acute intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism, with efficacy similar to conventional-dose alteplase.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: