Key result
Low-dose peripheral systemic thrombolysis with rtPA resulted in rapid clinical and echocardiographic improvement in four patients with intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism.
Why the study?
The management of intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism is controversial, with increasing interest in treatment approaches more aggressive than anticoagulation alone.
Does low-dose peripheral systemic thrombolysis improve clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism?
Case Report (n=4)
Does low-dose peripheral systemic thrombolysis improve clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism?
Low-dose peripheral systemic thrombolysis may be a safe, effective, and accessible alternative to catheter-directed thrombolysis for intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism.
May support advanced therapies in select intermediate-high-risk PE; hypothesis-generating and leaves open need for RCTs.
Background: The management of intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is controversial with increasing interest in more aggressive treatment approaches than anticoagulation alone. Case summary: We describe the case series of four consecutive patients who presented to emergency room for acute shortness of breath. They were diagnosed with intermediate-high-risk acute PE based on the computed tomography pulmonary angiography and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) findings and the elevated simplified PE score index. They received bolus of 5 mg thrombolytics recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) administered through peripheral intravenous (i.v.) line followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 2 mg/h along with unfractionated heparin (UFH) at a rate of 500 mg/h for additional ≤10 h. There after the dose of UFH was increased to reach a therapeutic level. Rapid clinical improvement and also improvement in TTE parameters were noted at discharge. Patients were discharged home on oral anticoagulation. Discussion: Intermediate-high-risk acute PE carries increased risk of mortality and morbidities. Catheter-directed thrombolysis uses a low rtPA dose for local thrombolysis and is associated with low bleeding risk; however it is expensive and requires expertise and human resources. Low-dose rtPA through a peripheral i.v. line might be safe and effective in the treatment of patient with intermediate-high-risk acute PE. This therapeutic approach is readily available at most medical centres, can be started in the emergency room (ER), and can be alternative to catheter-directed thrombolysis nowadays during the COVID-19 era and in hospitals at the periphery and with limited resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charif et al. (2022) conducted a case report in intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (n=4). Low-dose peripheral systemic thrombolysis (rtPA) was evaluated on Clinical and TTE parameter improvement at discharge. Low-dose peripheral systemic thrombolysis with rtPA resulted in rapid clinical and echocardiographic improvement in four patients with intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: