Key result
The Constitution in Chinese Medicine Questionnaire (CCMQ) demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α 0.72-0.80) and criterion validity with the SF-36 (r=0.58 for Pinghe constitution, P<0.01).
Cross-Sectional (n=2,500)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Constitution in Chinese Medicine Questionnaire (CCMQ) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing Chinese medicine constitution types.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
朱燕波 et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=2,500). Constitution in Chinese Medicine Questionnaire (CCMQ) vs. SF-36 was evaluated on Reliability (reproducibility and internal consistency) and criterion validity (p=<0.01). The Constitution in Chinese Medicine Questionnaire (CCMQ) demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α 0.72-0.80) and criterion validity with the SF-36 (r=0.58 for Pinghe constitution, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: