The kinetics of oxidation of formic acid by cerium(IV) in the presence of ruthenium(III)(ca. 10–6 mol dm–3) in aqueous sulfuric acid media has been followed at different temperatures (30–50 °C). The rate of disappearance of cerium(IV) in the reaction has been found to be zero order with respect to cerium(IV) concentration. At a fixed [H+], under the conditions, [HCO2H]T[CeIV]T[Ru]T the observed zero-order rate constant (k0) conforms to: –d[CeIV]t/dt=k0=[Ru]T[HCO2H]T{kb+kc[HCO2H]T} where [Ru]T and [HCO2H]T represent the total concentration of ruthenium(III) and formic acid respectively. At 40 °C, [H2SO4]= 1.0 mol dm–3 and I= 2.75 mol dm–3 the values of 102kb and 102kc are 6.0 ± 0.1 dm3 mol–1 s–1 and 5.4 ± 0.1 dm6 mol–2 s–1 respectively. Both kb and kc are found to have an inverse hydrogen-ion dependence. Out of the different possible mono- and bis-complexes, RuIII(HCO2–) and RuIII(HCO2–)(HCO2H) have been found to be kinetically active in the slow oxidative steps (through an inner-sphere mechanism) leading to RuIIIH (through hydride transfer from the C–H bond of metal-bound formate) and CO2 followed by the rapid oxidation of RuIIIH to RuIII by cerium(IV). The activation parameters are ΔH‡= 46 ± 3 kJ mol–1, ΔS‡=–125 ± 5 J K–1 mol–1(for the kb path) and ΔH‡= 47 ± 3 kJ mol–1, ΔS‡=–120 ± 5 J K–1 mol–1(for the kc path).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: