Key result
GP IIIa Pl(A2) allele carriers did not show an increased risk for myocardial infarction compared with Pl(A1/A1) homozygotes.
Why the study?
Does Glycoprotein IIIa Pl(A1/A2) polymorphism increase the risk of myocardial infarction compared to Pl(A1/A1) homozygotes?
Does Glycoprotein IIIa Pl(A1/A2) polymorphism increase the risk of myocardial infarction compared to Pl(A1/A1) homozygotes?
Genotype determination of GP IIIa Pl(A1/A2) polymorphism is currently not useful for risk assessment of myocardial infarction.
Does not support GP IIIa Pl(A2) genotyping for MI risk assessment; leaves open its relevance in other cardiovascular phenotypes.
The hemostatic platelet response of an individual may be influenced by the genetic profile of the platelet membrane glycoprotein (GP) receptors. The GP IIIa, as a part of von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen receptor, plays a central role in platelet aggregation. Polymorphism in GP IIIa has been extensively studied for its association with myocardial infarction or coronary artery diseases. To date, the role of GP IIIa polymorphism in genetic susceptibility to thrombotic disease still remains controversial. The results of case-control association studies vary, even with the same ethnic background, and the association was hardly found in studies with larger sample size, suggesting publication-bias toward positive findings. In meta-analysis, the GP IIIa Pl(A2) allele carriers did not show increased risk for myocardial infarction compared with Pl(A1/A1) homozygotes. The functional studies also showed conflicting results. In conclusion, GP IIIa Pl(A1/A2) polymorphism does not seem to have a major role either in determining the individual variance of platelet function or the risk of myocardial infarction according to the currently available data. Therefore, the genotype determination of GP IIIa Pl(A1/A2 )polymorphism may not be useful for risk assessment of myocardial infarction at this time. Nevertheless, the author can not completely exclude its possible role in coronary thrombosis after angioplasty or sudden cardiac death. Thus, further evaluation in larger prospective or multicenter studies is required to elucidate the role of GPs in cardiovascular system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyun‐Young Park (2005) conducted a review in Myocardial infarction. GP IIIa Pl(A1/A2) polymorphism vs. Pl(A1/A1) homozygotes was evaluated on Myocardial infarction. GP IIIa Pl(A2) allele carriers did not show an increased risk for myocardial infarction compared with Pl(A1/A1) homozygotes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: