Key result
Posterior circulation infarcts had similar 90-day stroke recurrence as anterior infarcts (7.4% vs 8.3%; HR 1.01, P=0.94); ticagrelor-aspirin was superior to clopidogrel-aspirin in both groups.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether infarct location affects stroke recurrence, and whether responses to dual antiplatelets differ between posterior and anterior circulation infarcts after minor stroke or TIA.
Does ticagrelor-aspirin reduce new stroke compared to clopidogrel-aspirin in patients with posterior versus anterior circulation minor stroke or transient ischemic attack?
RCT (n=4,168)
Double-blind
Yes
Does ticagrelor-aspirin reduce new stroke compared to clopidogrel-aspirin in patients with posterior versus anterior circulation minor stroke or transient ischemic attack?
Ticagrelor-aspirin is superior to clopidogrel-aspirin in reducing 90-day stroke recurrence in patients with minor stroke or TIA, regardless of infarct location (posterior vs. anterior circulation).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ticagrelor-aspirin over clopidogrel-aspirin after minor stroke or TIA; extends dual antiplatelet benefit across posterior and anterior circulation.
Background: It is unclear whether infarct location affects stroke recurrence after index ischemic stroke. We aimed to compare the risk of stroke recurrence and the responses to dual antiplatelets with ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin between patients with posterior circulation infarct (PCI) and those with anterior circulation infarct (ACI) after minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. Methods: Data were obtained from the double-blind CHANCE-2 trial (Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel With Aspirin in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II), which was conducted across 202 centers in China from September 2019 to March 2021. Patients with positive diffusion-weighted imaging were included and classified into PCI and ACI groups according to the hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were a new stroke and severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days, respectively. Results: A total of 4168 patients were included in this substudy, with 1427 PCI and 2741 ACI. During the 90-day follow-up, the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with PCI was similar to that with ACI (7.4% versus 8.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.79–1.29]; P =0.94). In comparison with clopidogrel-aspirin, ticagrelor-aspirin significantly reduced the risk of stroke recurrence in both the PCI (hazard ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.40–0.89]; P =0.01) and ACI groups (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.50–0.85]; P =0.002). There was no treatment-by-infarct location interaction ( P value for interaction, 0.92). The risk of severe or moderate bleeding was similar between PCI and ACI patients ( P =0.19). However, the risk of any bleeding increased on ticagrelor-aspirin than clopidogrel-aspirin treatment in PCI and ACI patients ( P =0.02 and 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that stroke recurrence was similar between PCI and ACI in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. Additionally, ticagrelor-aspirin was superior to clopidogrel-aspirin in reducing the risk of stroke within 90 days in both PCI and ACI patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=4,168). Posterior circulation infarct (PCI) vs. Anterior circulation infarct (ACI) was evaluated on new stroke within 90 days (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.79-1.29, p=0.94). Posterior circulation infarcts had similar 90-day stroke recurrence as anterior infarcts (7.4% vs 8.3%; HR 1.01, P=0.94); ticagrelor-aspirin was superior to clopidogrel-aspirin in both groups.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: