Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Almost all fresh-market sweet cherry is currently hand-picked. A decreasing labor supply and rising harvesting costs have caused producers to begin moving toward mechanical harvesting. This study focused on studying different combinations of shaking frequency and duration for a hydraulically-powered mechanical shaking end-effector for effectively harvesting fresh-market sweet cherry from “Y” trellis trees. Shaking frequencies of 14 and 18 Hz, combined with shaking durations of 2 and 5 s, were evaluated in an orchard environment. Dislodged fruit was captured on a sheet laid under the tree, collected and weighed after each shaking interval. This procedure was repeated 4 or 10 times based on two different shaking durations used in the study to reach a cumulative shaking time of 20 s. Each combination was replicated on three trees. Results indicated that the first 2-s interval of 14 Hz shaking removed 29% of total fruit on average from the test trees, and the first 5-s interval of 18 Hz shaking removed 38% on average. Multiple shaking intervals with a total of 20 s shaking duration removed 81%, 73%, 62% and 59% of total fruit on average from four 5-s 18 Hz intervals, ten 2-s 14 Hz intervals, four 5-s 14 Hz intervals and ten 2-s 18 Hz intervals respectively, indicating that both frequency and duration have effects on fruit removal efficiency of a mechanical cherry harvesting system. Based on visual observation, over 60% of remaining fruit were growing on long and slender twigs. This result suggested that a proper pruning of cherry trees to minimize the number and/or length of small and long twigs could contribute substantially to the improvement of the overall fruit removal efficiency of the shaking-based mechanical harvesting system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: