Experimental study reveals rapid quantification of black soldier fly larvae in barley flour mixtures, indicating near-infrared spectroscopy as an effective quality control tool.
This study evaluated the ability of two near infrared (NIR) instruments (e.g. bench top and portable) combined with chemometrics (e.g. PCA and PLS regression) to trace the addition of different levels (0.5% to 20% w/w) of black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) meal into barley flour samples. The effects of batch, BSFL processing treatment (drying and blanching) and the number of replicates on the prediction (SECV - standard error of cross validation) of the level of addition was evaluated. Mixture samples were prepared by combining three batches (B1 to B3), three processing methods (T1 to T3), and replicates (triplicates). The PCA score plot showed a separation between samples according to batch and mixtures (level of addition). The PLS regression models predicted the level of addition of BSFL meal to barley flour with a coefficient of determination in cross-validation (R 2 CV ) ranging from 0.76 to 0.90, depending on the instrument used to collect the spectra. The RPD values ranged from 2 to 6.1 depending on the combination of batch, treatment and instrument used during calibration. The standard error of prediction (SEP) obtained for the prediction of the level of BSFL meal addition was 2.63% using the benchtop or 4.10% using the portable NIR instrument. The study demonstrated that the prediction of the addition of BSFL to barley flour is possible, however, the accuracy of the method will depend on factors such as level of addition of BSFL meal to the barley flour, while batch or processing might have an effect. The development and implementation of rapid analytical methods such as those based on the utilization of NIR spectroscopy, will provide with no-destructive and green tools to the BSFL industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Čaloudová et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: