// Zhiyu Wang 1, * , Xiaoting Wen 1, * , Yaohong Lu 1 , Yang Yao 1 , Hui Zhao 1 1 Department of Internal Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Hui Zhao, e-mail: zhao-hui@sjtu.edu.cn Keywords: machine learning, skeletal-related events, bone metastases, decision tree, support vector machine Received: October 11, 2015 Accepted: January 24, 2016 Published: February 09, 2016 ABSTRACT The aim of the bone metastases (BM) treatment is to prevent the occurrence of skeletal-related events (SREs). In clinical, physicians could only predict the occurrence of SREs by subjective experience. Machine learning (ML) could be used as predictive models in the medical field. But there is no published research using ML to predict SREs in cancer patients with BM. The purpose of this study was to assess the associations of clinical variables with the occurrence of SREs and to subsequently develop prediction models to help identify SREs risk groups. We analyzed 1143 cancer patients with BM. We used the statistical package of SPSS and SPSS Modeler for data analysis and the development of the prediction model. We compared the performance of logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT) and support vector machine(SVM). The results suggested that Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale was a key factor to SREs in LR, DT and SVM model. Modifiable factors such as Frankel classification, Mirels score, Ca, aminoterminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) were identified. We found that the result of applying LR, DT and SVM classification accuracy was 79.2%, 85.8% and 88.2%, with 9, 4 and 8 variables, respectively. In conclusion, DT and SVM achieved higher accuracies with smaller number of variables than the number of variables used in LR. ML techniques can be used to build model to predict SREs in cancer patients with BM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: