Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many commonly accepted models for understanding disability use a vertical method in which disability is defined as a category into which people are slotted based on whether or not they fit its definitional criteria. This method, and the models of disability developed in accordance with it, inevitably homogenizes the experiences of disabled people to preserve the integrity of the definition of disability that a given model provides. A hermeneutic investigation and critique of commonly accepted models for understanding disability will provide an epistemological tool that makes it possible both to critique and to augment contemporary models of disability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandra Kavanagh (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: