PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1996Radiology311 citations

Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation.

View Full Paper
CJCarlos Jamis‐DowPCP L ChoykeSJScott Jennings

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivities of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) for detection and characterization of surgically verified small renal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease or hereditary papillary renal cancer underwent CT and US before partial nephrectomy or enucleation; 205 renal masses were removed (92% were <3 cm). Detection rates and accuracy of CT and US in the characterization of renal morphology were correlated with lesion size. RESULTS: CT and US detection rates for lesions of 0-5 mm were respectively 47% and 0%; 5-10 mm, 60% and 21%; 10-15 mm, 75% and 28%; 15-20 mm, 100% and 58%; 20-25 mm, 100% and 79%; and 25-30 mm, 100% and 100%. Among the lesions 10-35 mm, 80% and 82% were correctly characterized with CT and US, respectively. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of lesions under 1 cm were not detected with either modality. Neither CT nor US was superior in the characterization of lesions 3 cm or less. CT and particularly US screening studies in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease should be interpreted cautiously because missed or mischaracterized small renal lesions are a frequent problem in these patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jamis‐Dow et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a941f23b8ef79c486216262https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628872
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper