Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The inaccuracies of widely used approximations to the theory of the off-diagonal elements ε1= ε′1 + iε″1 of the permittivity tensor are examined. Errors occurring in the ‘‘diamagnetic’’ case can become important when curve fitting is employed to extract parameter values from Bi-substituted magnetic garnets. A discrepancy between the exact and approximate forms of the ε′1 relation (which is responsible for Faraday rotation and Kerr ellipticity at lower energies) as a function of transition energy is found in the low-energy (wavelength λ∼1 μm) tails of the lines and originates from the dropping of a nonresonant term from the complete theory. Errors also occur in the line shapes near resonance where the ratio of the excited-state splitting to the Lorentzian linewidth approaches unity (Δ/Γ→1). A family of curves with Δ/Γ as a parameter is presented, and an exact expression relating Δ/Γ to the resonance value of ε′1/ε″0 (where ε″0 is the imaginary part of the diagonal element ε0) is derived.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: