Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The discovery of a specific high-affinity growth hormone (GH) binding protein (GH-BP) in plasma adds complexity to the dynamics of GH secretion and clearance. Intuitive predictions are that such a protein would damp sharp oscillations in GH concentrations otherwise caused by bursts of GH secretion into the blood volume, prolong the apparent half-life of circulating GH, and contribute a reservoir function. To test these implicit considerations, we formulated an explicit mathematical model of pulsatile GH secretion and clearance in the presence of absence of a specific high-affinity GH-BP. Simulation experiments revealed that the pulsatile mode of physiological GH secretion creates a highly dynamic (nonequilibrium) system, in which the half-life of free GH, its instantaneous secretion rate, and the GH-BP affinity and capacity all contribute to defining momentary levels of free, bound, and total GH, the percentage of GH bound to protein, and the percentage occupancy of GH-BP [corrected]. In contrast, the amount of free GH at equilibrium is specified only by the GH distribution volume and secretion rate and the half-life of free hormone. We conclude that the in vivo dynamics of GH secretion, trapping, and clearance from the circulation offer a variety of regulatory loci at which the time structure of free, bound, and total GH delivery to target tissues can be controlled physiologically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veldhuis et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: