Key result
The ASPC Top Ten 2020 summarizes essential information on ten common cardiovascular disease risk factors to provide a succinct overview for preventive cardiology.
Why the study?
Rapid advancements in medical science make it challenging for clinicians to stay up-to-date on multifaceted aspects of CVD prevention and newest applicable guidelines.
Provides a succinct overview of ten common cardiovascular disease risk factors applicable to preventive cardiology.
Serves as quick reference for risk factor awareness; leaves open validation of practice impact.
Preventive cardiology involves understanding and managing multiple cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Given the rapid advancements in medical science, it may be challenging for the busy clinician to remain up-to-date on the multifaceted and fundamental aspects of CVD prevention, and maintain awareness of the newest applicable guidelines. The "American Society for Preventive Cardiology (ASPC) Top Ten 2020" summarizes ten essential things to know about ten important CVD risk factors, listed in tabular formats. The ten CVD risk factors include unhealthful nutrition, physical inactivity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, high blood pressure, obesity, considerations of select populations (older age, race/ethnicity, and gender), thrombosis/smoking, kidney dysfunction and genetics/familial hypercholesterolemia. For the individual patient, other CVD risk factors may be relevant, beyond the CVD risk factors discussed here. However, it is the intent of the "ASPC Top Ten 2020" to provide a succinct overview of things to know about ten common CVD risk factors applicable to preventive cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harold Bays (2020) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease risk factors. Cardiovascular disease risk factors was evaluated. The ASPC Top Ten 2020 summarizes essential information on ten common cardiovascular disease risk factors to provide a succinct overview for preventive cardiology.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: