Authors
1.___We summarized previously published mass–length relationships for aquatic insects, and determined the relationship between dry body mass and body length for eight genera and seven families of benthic insects from Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick, Canada. 2.___A power function was the most commonly used model in the earlier studies and best described the observed mass–length relationship for taxa from Catamaran Brook. 3.___Predicted mass at length was highly variable (coefficient of variation_≥ 25%) among models developed in different studies for the same family group. This variability presumably resulted from both variation in the methods used to construct the models, and in the natural spatio‐temporal and taxonomic variation in mass at length, although the relative contributions of these two sources cannot be determined from existing data. 4.___Several recommendations are made for the development and application of mass–length equations in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnston et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: