Key result
Analysis of the FDA MAUDE database revealed over 25,000 complaints of continuous glucose monitor sensor inaccuracy, including instances directly leading to serious outcomes.
Why the study?
Is nonadjunctive use of continuous glucose monitors for insulin dosing safe in patients with diabetes?
Observational
Is nonadjunctive use of continuous glucose monitors for insulin dosing safe in patients with diabetes?
Nonadjunctive use of continuous glucose monitors for insulin dosing may pose safety risks due to sporadic, unpredictable, large errors, highlighting the need for confirmatory readings.
With the increasing accuracy of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) have come calls for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to label these devices as safe for nonadjunctive dosing of insulin. However, there is evidence that these devices are subject to sporadic, unpredictable, large errors. A text analysis of reports to the FDA MAUDE database since 2015 reveals over 25 000 complaints of CGM sensor inaccuracy, with instances directly leading to serious outcomes. These new data were not considered at a recent FDA Advisory Panel meeting that voted to approve Dexcom G5 relabeling for nonadjunctive use. Social media is another source of surveillance data providing evidence of large CGM inaccuracies in real-world use. We need to improve safety procedures, not remove them. CGMs offer unique information and alerts for managing diabetes, but the issue is not whether they are better than other approaches to monitoring glucose, but how they can be best used in conjunction with devices that offer the confirmatory readings needed for patient safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan R. Shapiro (2017) conducted an observational in Diabetes. Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) for nonadjunctive insulin dosing was evaluated on CGM sensor inaccuracy complaints. Analysis of the FDA MAUDE database revealed over 25,000 complaints of continuous glucose monitor sensor inaccuracy, including instances directly leading to serious outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: