Key result
Principal component analysis of dynamic ICG fluorescence imaging revealed that the explained variance of the second principal component was significantly lower in diabetic patients than in normal controls.
Why the study?
Does principal component analysis of dynamic ICG fluorescence imaging detect diabetic vasculopathy compared to normal controls?
Observational
Does principal component analysis of dynamic ICG fluorescence imaging detect diabetic vasculopathy compared to normal controls?
PCA of dynamic ICG fluorescence imaging, particularly the second principal component, may serve as a useful bioimaging marker for screening diabetic vasculopathy.
May support non-invasive vasculopathy screening in diabetes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has been clinically used for noninvasive visualizations of vascular structures. We have previously developed a diagnostic system based on dynamic ICG fluorescence imaging for sensitive detection of vascular disorders. However, because high-dimensional raw data were used, the analysis of the ICG dynamics proved difficult. We used principal component analysis (PCA) in this study to extract important elements without significant loss of information. We examined ICG spatiotemporal profiles and identified critical features related to vascular disorders. PCA time courses of the first three components showed a distinct pattern in diabetic patients. Among the major components, the second principal component (PC2) represented arterial-like features. The explained variance of PC2 in diabetic patients was significantly lower than in normal controls. To visualize the spatial pattern of PCs, pixels were mapped with red, green, and blue channels. The PC2 score showed an inverse pattern between normal controls and diabetic patients. We propose that PC2 can be used as a representative bioimaging marker for the screening of vascular diseases. It may also be useful in simple extractions of arterial-like features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Diabetic vasculopathy. Principal component analysis (PCA) of dynamic ICG fluorescence imaging vs. Normal controls was evaluated on Explained variance of the second principal component (PC2). Principal component analysis of dynamic ICG fluorescence imaging revealed that the explained variance of the second principal component was significantly lower in diabetic patients than in normal controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: