OBJECTIVE: To review the current options for prevention and treatment of veno-occlusive disease in bone marrow transplant patients. DATA SOURCES: Articles were selected from a MEDLINE search (1966-October 1999) using the key terms veno-occlusive disease and bone marrow transplantation. In addition, references of all articles were examined for articles not found in the computer-based search. DATA EXTRACTION: All clinical trials, case-control studies, and case reports were evaluated. RESULTS: Heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, prostaglandin E1, ursodiol, and glutamine have been studied for prevention of veno-occlusive disease. Heparin has been studied most extensively; however, no preventive regimen has a defined role in therapy. For treatment, tissue plasminogen activator has been evaluated most thoroughly, yet its safety and efficacy have not been clearly established in patients with veno-occlusive disease. Other possible treatment options include antithrombin-III, defibrotide, glutamine plus vitamin E, and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available data, the most promising agents are ursodiol for prevention and defibrotide or glutamineplus vitamin E for treatment of veno-occlusive disease. Further clinical trials are needed to establish the appropriate preventive and treatment options available for bone marrow transplant patients suffering from veno-occlusive disease. To date, such decisions depend largely on poorly designed trials, case reports, and clinical experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pegram et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: